View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Engineering Failure Scenario Analysis | ![]() UX Research Tree Testing | ![]() Decision Making Pre-Mortem |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In critical processes, it is not enough to plan only for the normal case. Failure Scenario Analysis looks at the path into failure and shows which failures, chains, and control gaps cause the most damage. | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-2 Tage | 20–45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | Based on research question | Small cross-functional group |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Failure Scenarios, Risk Notes, Control Gaps, Test and Response Actions | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption log |
Tagsno overlap | FailureResilienceRisk | Information architectureNavigationFindability | RiskDecisionFailurePlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






