View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  UX Research Affinity Diagramming |  UX Design Service Blueprinting |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | When research notes, feedback, or observations sit unconnected side by side, affinity diagramming sorts the raw material into solid themes. Many individual points turn into patterns that make decisions and opportunities clearer. | When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min | 45–90 min | 0.5-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 4-8 | 3-10 | 6-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Theme clusters, Insight statements, Opportunity areas | Service Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership Map |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | SynthesisQualitativeRoot cause | Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
