methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Purposedifferent
When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.
Complexitydifferent
LowMedium
Timedifferent
5-15 min1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-20Based on research question
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Ranked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
Information architectureNavigationFindability
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing