methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Purposedifferent
When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.
Complexitysame
LowLow
Timedifferent
5-15 min5-20 min
Participantssame
3-203-20
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Ranked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistEffort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
EstimationEffortRisk
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration for PERT Estimation.
Decision Making
PERT Estimation