View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Design Charrette |  Innovation SCAMPER |  Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. | For an existing solution under pressure to change, the method deliberately opens space for systematic variants. It directs attention to rebuilding, combining, and repurposing rather than only new basic ideas. This produces concrete evolution paths for products, offerings, or workflows. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage | 30-60 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 2-10 | 3-7 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction | SCAMPER Idea List, Concept Shortlist, Variation Notes | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityReframingInnovation | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
