View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Delegation Poker | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker | ![]() Systems Thinking Stock and Flow Diagram |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | A Stock and Flow Diagram shows how stocks, inflows, and outflows shape a system over time. It is especially suited when growth, delays, or capacity limits determine the dynamics. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-10 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Stock and Flow Model, Dynamics Notes, Simulation Hypotheses |
Tagsno overlap | AutonomyRolesTeam | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | DynamicsSimulationFeedbackSystems thinking |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






