View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Decision Matrix | ![]() Business Strategy Three Horizons | ![]() Product Strategy RICE Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic. | Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon. | When many initiatives compete for the same resources, it brings reach, impact, confidence, and effort into one shared ranking. It makes prioritization economically connectable. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | Halbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-12 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Decision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected Option | Horizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource plan | RICE Scores, Ranked List, Assumption Log |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs | StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight | PrioritizationScoringRoadmapTradeoffs |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






