View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Decision Matrix | ![]() Facilitation Dot Estimation | ![]() Product Strategy RICE Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | When many initiatives compete for the same resources, it brings reach, impact, confidence, and effort into one shared ranking. It makes prioritization economically connectable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 5-20 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-20 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Decision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected Option | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | RICE Scores, Ranked List, Assumption Log |
Tagsno overlap | DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs | EstimationEffortRisk | PrioritizationScoringRoadmapTradeoffs |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






