View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree | ![]() Systems Thinking System Dynamics Simulation | ![]() Systems Thinking Wardley Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. | System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports. | Wardley Mapping makes visible where an offering stands today and where it can evolve. The method connects user need, value chain, and evolution stages into a strategic basis for platform, build, or buy decisions. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 1-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas | Simulation Model, Scenario Reports | Wardley Map, Strategic Options, Evolution Notes |
Tags1 shared | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality | Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis | StrategySystems thinkingDynamics |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






