View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree | ![]() Innovation Design Charrette | ![]() Innovation Reverse Brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. | For persistent errors or blockages, the method shifts the view to the opposite of the desired effect. It exposes the mechanics of failure and makes hidden causes easier to grasp. This makes improvement more concrete and the problem clearer. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-6 h | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 10-50 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction | Reverse Ideas, Risk Themes, Solution Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityRisk |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






