View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Contradiction Analysis |  Agile Sailboat Retrospective |
|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 4-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Contradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
