View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Contradiction Analysis |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Decision Making RAPID |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 15-45 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-3 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Contradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | RAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log |
Tagsno overlap | ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | DecisionRolesGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
