View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  UX Research HEART Framework |  Product Discovery Kano Model |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 120 min initial, dann laufend | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 3-6 | 10-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchObservationContext | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
