View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Consensus Workshop | ![]() Innovation Round Robin Brainstorming | ![]() Innovation Starbursting |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | With unevenly distributed speaking time, the method brings every person into the contribution one after another. It prevents early voices from setting the direction while still producing a shared idea space. This makes participation plannable and the team's diversity visible. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 20-45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-30 | 4-10 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Idea List, Cluster, Shortlist | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | BrainstormingIdeationFacilitationInclusionCreativity | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






