View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Product Strategy OKRs |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When strategic direction needs to become measurable, it connects ambition with checkable results. It makes goals connectable to focus and review. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 5-15 min | 1-2 h Setup |
Participantsdifferent | 5-30 | 3-20 | 2-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | OKR set, Measurement plan, Review cadence |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | GoalsAlignmentOutcomesMeasurement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
