View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Concierge MVP | ![]() UX Research Tree Testing |
|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 Kunden | Based on research question |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA |
Tagsno overlap | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | Information architectureNavigationFindability |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.





