View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Concierge MVP | ![]() Innovation Round Robin Brainstorming | ![]() Innovation Starbursting |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | With unevenly distributed speaking time, the method brings every person into the contribution one after another. It prevents early voices from setting the direction while still producing a shared idea space. This makes participation plannable and the team's diversity visible. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 20-45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 Kunden | 4-10 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Idea List, Cluster, Shortlist | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List |
Tagsno overlap | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | BrainstormingIdeationFacilitationInclusionCreativity | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






