methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Paper illustration for Standard Work Analysis.
Operations
Standard Work Analysis
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Purposedifferent
When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.When the same task is done differently depending on the person, the method exposes the reliable core. It creates comparability without unnecessarily choking off needed latitude.When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
20-45 min1-3 h1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question2-6Based on research question
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Content groups, Label set, IA hypothesesStandard Work Sheet, Deviation List, Improved Standard, Training NeedsFindability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationStructure
LeanProcessQuality
Information architectureNavigationFindability
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving