View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Innovation Rapid Ideation |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When a decision needs to be prepared quickly, the method generates many solution-close variants in a short time. It deliberately relies on pace to undercut self-censorship and perfectionism. This quickly produces a usable field for prioritization and further work. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 10-20 min | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 4-100+ | 1-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Ideenpool, Roh-Shortlist, Cluster |
Tagsno overlap | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | BrainstormingIdeationDivergenceSpeed |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
