View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Agile WSJF |  Delivery Monte Carlo Forecasting |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, and Risk Communication. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | High |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 45-90 min | 30-90 min Setup, danach laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 1-3 | 3-10 | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, Risk Communication |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | ForecastingFlowDelivery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
