methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration of Design Charrette with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Design Charrette
Purposedifferent
For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space.
Complexitydifferent
LowMedium
Timedifferent
15-30 minHalber Tag bis mehrere Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-610-50
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Root cause notes, CountermeasuresSketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction
Tagsno overlap
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

A paper-based illustration representing Brainstorming with its core stages and visible working result.
Innovation
Brainstorming
Paper illustration of the Lotus Blossom working structure.
Innovation
Lotus Blossom
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Paper illustration of Starbursting with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Starbursting