View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min | 60-120 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-100+ | 5-12 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | AutonomyRolesTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
