View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation 1-2-4-All | ![]() Facilitation Nominal Group Technique | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min | 60-120 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-100+ | 5-12 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






