View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation 1-2-4-All | ![]() Innovation Lotus Blossom | ![]() Innovation Brainwriting |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When a central question feels too large, the method breaks it into neighboring topic fields with their own depth of ideation. It holds structure and openness at the same time, so adjacent perspectives don't get lost. This grows an idea space out of a core problem. | When loud voices or hierarchy distort the idea search, the method creates a quiet entry into joint development. It gives everyone thinking space and gathers contributions without social brakes, making diversity more visible and easier to build on. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min | 45-90 min | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-100+ | 3-10 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Lotus Diagram, Idea Themes, Shortlist | Idea sheets, Expanded concepts, Prioritized list |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityDivergenceWorkshop | BrainstormingCollaborationInclusionIdeas |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






