View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation 1-2-4-All | ![]() Decision Making Decision Tree | ![]() Innovation Design Charrette |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min | 30-90 min | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 4-100+ | 1-6 | 10-50 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Decision Tree, Option Map, Assumption List | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | DecisionTreeOptions | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






