A concrete strategic decision occasion is formulated, such as market entry, investment, repositioning or strategy offsite.
SWOT Analysis
Prerequisite
What needs to be finished first
Relevant stakeholders with market and internal knowledge are identified and confirmed as participants.
Preparation
What needs to be ready before start
Whiteboard or Miro board with four-field grid (Strengths, Weaknesses on top; Opportunities, Threats below); stickies in four colors; markers; template for TOWS linking as second page.
One facilitator who structures discussion; four to eight participants from strategy, sales, product and operations; one scribe who records evidence and sources.
Current market data and competitor analysis; internal performance metrics from last two quarters; known trends from PESTLE; existing strategy or vision papers.
90-120 min
Create grid, make definition of every cell visible (internal vs. external, positive vs. negative). State rule: every entry needs evidence (number, source, observation). Timer at 20 min per cell.
Core question
The one question this method answers
Which internal strengths and weaknesses meet which external opportunities and threats, and which action logic follows from that?
Flow
Marker: Phase
| Step | Duration | Action | Hint |
|---|---|---|---|
1Phase 1: Sharpen scope and evidence | 15 min | Make strategic occasion and unit of analysis explicit (whole company, business area, product). Tighten evidence rule: no entry without source or metric. | If unit stays unclear, group mixes statements about corporation and product. Choose one level, otherwise double work. |
2Phase 2: Strengths and Weaknesses | 25 min | Collect only internally influenceable factors. Every entry with evidence and differentiating reference size (against competition, market, previous year). | Statements like "motivated team" without comparison are not a strength. If every competitor could claim same, it is not differentiator. |
3Phase 3: Opportunities and Threats | 25 min | Collect only external factors that company does not control. Note probability and expected impact per entry. | If group places internal topics in Opportunities ("we could build X"), move them. X is measure, not opportunity. |
4Phase 4: TOWS linking | 30 min | Cross fields pairwise: SO (use strengths for opportunities), WO (reduce weaknesses for opportunities), ST (use strengths against threats), WT (avoid weaknesses and threats). Derive 2-3 options per quadrant. | Without TOWS, SWOT remains a list. Only crossing creates options. If a quadrant stays empty, data basis there is thin. |
5Phase 5: Prioritization and follow-up | 15 min | Choose three to five strategic directions from TOWS options, each with owner, hypothesis and success indicator. Remaining options into backlog. | If all options seem equally important, prioritization is missing. Add dot-voting or Decision Matrix. |
Artifact
What comes out at the end
Structured document with SWOT quadrants, TOWS matrix and prioritized strategic-direction list. Every entry contains evidence, source and date; directions have owner, hypothesis and indicator.
One file per strategy cycle with date and unit of analysis in header. Archive previous version, do not overwrite. Re-reference evidence with source and date on every update.
- Miro or FigJam board with SWOT and TOWS templates
- Notion or Confluence page with tables
- Google Slides as strategy artifact for leadership circle
- PowerPoint strategy deck with quadrant and TOWS slide
strategy-brief-markdown.md
Compact briefing for strategic context, target state, priorities, and non-goals.
Strategy Brief
Context
Why is this strategic clarification needed now?
Target state
What should be different in 6-12 months?
Priorities
- ...
- ...
- ...
Non-goals
- ...
Metrics
- North Star Metric:
- Guardrail Metrics:
Risks
- ...
Decisions
Which decisions should follow from this?
Example output
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
swot-beispiel.md
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
SWOT - Solo tax advisor Sabine Bertram, Q2 2026
Unit of analysis: Solo practice, focus solo self-employed and small entrepreneurs.
Strengths
- 92% client retention over 3 years (industry average 78%, source: DStV Report 2025).
- DATEV certification level 3, local competition only level 1-2.
Weaknesses
- Utilization at 95%, no capacity for new business (time tracking CW 18-20).
- No succession solution, single-person risk during illness.
Opportunities
- E-invoice mandate from 2027 creates consulting need among 320 local solo self-employed workers (IHK figures).
- Colleague Ms Otto retires, approx. 80 mandates seeking succession.
Threats
- Online tax-advisory platforms lower price level by 15-20% (competitive observation).
- DATEV license costs rise by 12% in 2027.
TOWS strategic directions (prioritized)
- SO: E-invoice onboarding package for 30 new clients from Otto practice, owner: Sabine, hypothesis EUR 25k additional revenue/year.
- WO: Hire half-time tax clerk from 09/2026, owner: Sabine, indicator utilization below 80%.
- WT: Substitution agreement with firm Mueller by 2026-07-31, owner: Sabine.
Pitfalls
Recognize symptoms and steer against them
Evidence-free claims
Entries such as "strong team" or "difficult market" without number, source or comparison.
Demand evidence for every entry. If no evidence exists, mark as hypothesis and set research follow-up, do not put in final version.
Internal and external confused
Internal measures appear under Opportunities, external trends under Strengths.
Repeat cell definition before every phase. Strengths/Weaknesses = company can change it itself. Opportunities/Threats = company must accept it.
TOWS skipped
Workshop ends with four lists without deriving options.
Force TOWS into agenda. Reserve at least 30 min. SWOT without TOWS is diagnosis without therapy.
No comparison basis for differentiation
Strengths are properties every competitor could claim equally.
Ask "compared to whom". If answer names nobody concrete, it is not a Strength, but hygiene prerequisite.
Unit of analysis too broad
Statements swing between corporate level and individual product, quadrants contradict each other.
Choose one level. If both levels matter, run two SWOTs in sequence, not parallel.
Prioritization by consensus
All strategic directions marked "important", no selection made.
Add Decision Matrix or dot-voting. Maximum five directions in final artifact, rest into backlog.
Stop criteria
Done signals checkable in under a minute
Finished the runsheet?
Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.