The scope and purpose of Pretotyping are stated as a concrete question.
Pretotyping
A practical method guide: clarify prerequisites and materials, understand the complete process, and look up outputs, pitfalls, and stop criteria.
Prerequisite
What needs to be finished first
Idea and target segment, observable commitment, ethical and operational boundaries and domain decision makers are available.
Preparation
What needs to be ready before start
Idea and target segment, observable commitment, ethical and operational boundaries, shared workspace, source links, and decision log.
Idea owner · Research/Growth · builder · Risk/Legal as needed
Collect Idea and target segment, observable commitment, ethical and operational boundaries in advance and mark open assumptions.
1 day to 2 weeks
Prepare XYZ hypothesis plus Mechanical Turk, Pinocchio, Fake Door, or concierge pretotype visibly and calibrate assessment terms before starting.
Core question
The one question this method answers
Does the target audience show real behaviour for this idea before we build it?
Flow
Phases with goal, actions, output and pitfall
Pretotyping first asks whether the right thing is being built. A hypothesis, skin-in-the-game behaviour, XYZ statement, and preset threshold limit self-deception.
pretotype evidence card
Fictional worked example
XYZ hypothesis plus Mechanical Turk, Pinocchio, Fake Door, or concierge pretotype as a precise working structure with a fictional example.
XYZ hypothesis
XYZ hypothesis information to record
≥3/20 qualifizierte Teams reservieren in 10 Tagen.
Pretotype
Pretotype information to record
Fake Door mit erstattbarer 50-€-Reservierung.
Commitment/denominator
Commitment/denominator information to record
4 gültige Reservierungen von 20.
Threshold/decision
Threshold/decision information to record
Schwelle erreicht: Pilot bauen.
The example demonstrates the domain logic of Pretotyping; worksheets remain blank.
- 1
XYZ hypothesis
XYZ hypothesis

Goal
Produce XYZ statement so the core question “Does the target audience show real behaviour for this idea before we build it?” can be answered with stronger support.
Inputs for this step
- Idea and target segment
- observable commitment
- ethical and operational boundaries
Actions
- Quantify audience, proportion, behaviour, and horizon.
- Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in XYZ statement.
Output
XYZ statement
XYZ statement · source · uncertainty · next decision
Quality check
Is behaviour stronger than opinion?
Pitfall
Costless clicks are treated as demand or the test violates trust and consent. Choose stronger commitment, qualify the audience, and plan debriefing, privacy, and refunds.
Timing: 10–20 minutes
- 2
Choose pretotype
Choose pretotype

Goal
Produce pretotype design so the core question “Does the target audience show real behaviour for this idea before we build it?” can be answered with stronger support.
Inputs for this step
- XYZ statement
- observable commitment
- ethical and operational boundaries
Actions
- Choose the cheapest credible simulation for the behaviour.
- Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in pretotype design.
Output
pretotype design
pretotype design · source · uncertainty · next decision
Quality check
Does the test avoid unnecessary build?
Pitfall
Costless clicks are treated as demand or the test violates trust and consent. Choose stronger commitment, qualify the audience, and plan debriefing, privacy, and refunds.
Timing: 10–20 minutes
- 3
Run test
Run test

Goal
Produce behaviour data so the core question “Does the target audience show real behaviour for this idea before we build it?” can be answered with stronger support.
Inputs for this step
- pretotype design
- observable commitment
- ethical and operational boundaries
Actions
- Capture traffic, eligibility, commitment, and drop-off cleanly.
- Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in behaviour data.
Output
behaviour data
behaviour data · source · uncertainty · next decision
Quality check
Is the denominator complete?
Pitfall
Costless clicks are treated as demand or the test violates trust and consent. Choose stronger commitment, qualify the audience, and plan debriefing, privacy, and refunds.
Timing: 10–20 minutes
- 4
Decide
Decide

Goal
Produce pretotype decision so the core question “Does the target audience show real behaviour for this idea before we build it?” can be answered with stronger support.
Inputs for this step
- behaviour data
- observable commitment
- ethical and operational boundaries
Actions
- Compare result to threshold and decide build, iterate, or stop.
- Record source, rationale, and open uncertainty directly in pretotype decision.
Output
pretotype decision
pretotype decision · source · uncertainty · next decision
Quality check
Was the rule set before seeing data?
Pitfall
Costless clicks are treated as demand or the test violates trust and consent. Choose stronger commitment, qualify the audience, and plan debriefing, privacy, and refunds.
Timing: 10–20 minutes
Artifact
What comes out at the end
Sketch: what the artifact looks like
Versioned pretotype evidence card with date, sources, owners, and next review.
Retain date, source, assumption state, and decision for every version of pretotype evidence card.
- pretotype evidence card as board or document
- Source and evidence register
- Decision and action log
pretotyping-working-template.md
Plan Pretotyping around its domain steps and the concrete decision question.
Pretotyping: Worksheet
Question
To be confirmed
Desired outcome
To be confirmed
Scope
Establish and review the practice Time: 1 day to 2 weeks
Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.
Preparation for this scope
Method setup
- Materials: Idea and target segment, observable commitment, ethical and operational boundaries, shared workspace, source links, and decision log.
- Roles: Idea owner · Research/Growth · builder · Risk/Legal as needed
- Advance information: Collect Idea and target segment, observable commitment, ethical and operational boundaries in advance and mark open assumptions.
- Overall time needed: 1 day to 2 weeks
- Setup: Prepare XYZ hypothesis plus Mechanical Turk, Pinocchio, Fake Door, or concierge pretotype visibly and calibrate assessment terms before starting.
Prepare for the work steps
XYZ hypothesis: XYZ hypothesis
- Idea and target segment
- observable commitment
- ethical and operational boundaries
Choose pretotype: Choose pretotype
- XYZ statement
- observable commitment
- ethical and operational boundaries
Run test: Run test
- pretotype design
- observable commitment
- ethical and operational boundaries
Decide: Decide
- behaviour data
- observable commitment
- ethical and operational boundaries
pretotype evidence card
XYZ hypothesis
XYZ hypothesis information to record
...
Pretotype
Pretotype information to record
...
Commitment/denominator
Commitment/denominator information to record
...
Threshold/decision
Threshold/decision information to record
...
Enter only real input, sources, and decisions.
XYZ hypothesis: XYZ hypothesis
Expected artifact: XYZ statement
XYZ statement · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Is behaviour stronger than opinion?
Choose pretotype: Choose pretotype
Expected artifact: pretotype design
pretotype design · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Does the test avoid unnecessary build?
Run test: Run test
Expected artifact: behaviour data
behaviour data · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Is the denominator complete?
Decide: Decide
Expected artifact: pretotype decision
pretotype decision · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Was the rule set before seeing data?
Open questions and next steps
...
Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/pretotyping/run-sheet
Example output
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
Fictional example for orientation. Counts and timings describe this case and are not universal requirements.
pretotyping-beispiel.md
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
XYZ: at least 3 of 20 qualified teams place a refundable €50 reservation for audit export within ten days. A fake door explains that pilot places start in four weeks. Result: five reservations, four valid after eligibility review.
Pitfalls
Recognize symptoms and steer against them
Quick overview, the full text is in the matching phase in the flow
- XYZ hypothesisCostless clicks are treated as demand or the test violates trust and consent.View in phase
- Choose pretotypeCostless clicks are treated as demand or the test violates trust and consent.View in phase
- Run testCostless clicks are treated as demand or the test violates trust and consent.View in phase
- DecideCostless clicks are treated as demand or the test violates trust and consent.View in phase
XYZ hypothesis
Costless clicks are treated as demand or the test violates trust and consent.
Choose stronger commitment, qualify the audience, and plan debriefing, privacy, and refunds.
Choose pretotype
Costless clicks are treated as demand or the test violates trust and consent.
Choose stronger commitment, qualify the audience, and plan debriefing, privacy, and refunds.
Run test
Costless clicks are treated as demand or the test violates trust and consent.
Choose stronger commitment, qualify the audience, and plan debriefing, privacy, and refunds.
Decide
Costless clicks are treated as demand or the test violates trust and consent.
Choose stronger commitment, qualify the audience, and plan debriefing, privacy, and refunds.
Stop criteria
When to pause, resolve prerequisites, or choose another approach
Finished the method guide?
Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.

