Fixed appointments, breaks and working hours are known.
ALPEN Method
A practical method guide: clarify prerequisites and materials, understand the complete process, and look up outputs, pitfalls, and stop criteria.
Prerequisite
What needs to be finished first
Preparation
What needs to be ready before start
Calendar, task list, duration estimates and brief actual-time notes.
The person planning; involve affected people for delegation or appointment changes.
Bring together calendar, open commitments and task list; calculate available working time excluding breaks.
5–10 minutes planning plus a brief review; daily practice
Open the daily list beside the calendar; separate planned and free time visibly and leave room for actual durations.
Core question
The one question this method answers
Which tasks fit into today’s available time including realistic buffers?
Flow
Phases with goal, actions, output and pitfall
Lothar Seiwert’s daily planning method connects listing tasks, estimating duration, reserving buffers, deciding priorities and reviewing results. The five German initials form a daily learning cycle between plans and actual effort.
ALPEN Method· worksheet
Fictional example
Lothar Seiwert’s daily planning method connects listing tasks, estimating duration, reserving buffers, deciding priorities and reviewing results. The five German initials form a daily learning cycle between plans and actual effort.
A: Tasks
What tasks, appointments and commitments are due today?
Fictional: write proposal, client call, invoices, filing.
L: Duration
How long does each task take including preparation?
Proposal 120, call 60, invoices 60, filing 90 minutes: 330 minutes.
P: Buffer
How much working time is available and how much remains free?
400 minutes excluding breaks; 240 planned and 160 buffer.
E: Decisions
What fits in planned capacity and what is deliberately changed?
Proposal, call and invoices remain; 90 minutes of filing are deferred.
N: Review
What was completed, how long did it take and what follows for tomorrow?
Proposal 140, call 60, invoices 50, interruptions 80 minutes. 330 of 400 minutes used; increase future proposal estimates.
All example details are fictional and illustrate the application.
- 1
A: Tasks
A: Aufgaben, list tasks

Goal
Complete daily list
Inputs for this step
- Calendar
- Tasks and commitments
Actions
- Collect tasks, appointments and outstanding commitments; name a visible result for each task.
- Split large tasks into parts that can be worked on today.
Output
Daily list
Are appointments and carried-over tasks included?
Quality check
Are appointments and carried-over tasks included?
Pitfall
Invisible routine work is missing. Add calendar commitments and recurring obligations.
Timing: 1–2 minutes
- 2
L: Duration
L: Länge, estimate duration

Goal
Effort estimate
Inputs for this step
- Daily list
- Previous actual times
Actions
- Estimate minutes per task and include fixed appointments.
- For uncertainty, record an estimate range and the key dependency.
Output
Estimates
Do estimates match similar completed tasks?
Quality check
Do estimates match similar completed tasks?
Pitfall
Desired duration replaces actual effort. Use previous actual times or split the task further.
Timing: 1–2 minutes
- 3
P: Buffer
P: Puffer, reserve buffers

Goal
Realistic planning capacity
Inputs for this step
- Available working time
- Effort estimate
Actions
- Leave part of available time unallocated; 60% planned and 40% buffer is an adjustable starting rule.
- Calibrate the buffer using past interruptions.
Output
Capacity
Is the buffer actually unallocated?
Quality check
Is the buffer actually unallocated?
Pitfall
Extra tasks occupy the buffer. Move extra tasks to an optional list.
Timing: 1–2 minutes
- 4
E: Decide
E: Entscheidungen, decide

Goal
Committed daily plan
Inputs for this step
- Planning capacity
- Priorities and deadlines
Actions
- Select important outcomes and keep planned duration within planning capacity.
- Drop, delegate or reschedule overflow; agree changes with affected people.
Output
Daily plan
Does the sum of commitments fit including buffer?
Quality check
Does the sum of commitments fit including buffer?
Pitfall
Everything receives the same top priority. Decide by consequences of delay and negotiate conflicts openly.
Timing: 1–2 minutes
- 5
N: Review
N: Nachkontrolle, review

Goal
Learning note for the next day
Inputs for this step
- Daily plan
- Actual times and interruptions
Actions
- At day’s end review completion and actual duration; note causes of variance and deliberately reconsider leftovers.
- Adjust buffers and future estimates from these observations.
Output
Learning note
Did a variance lead to a concrete adjustment?
Quality check
Did a variance lead to a concrete adjustment?
Pitfall
Open tasks are blindly copied each day. Reassess relevance, task size and commitment.
Timing: 2–5 minutes
Artifact
What comes out at the end
Sketch: what the artifact looks like
Daily plan with task, estimated duration, protected buffer, priority decision and actual-time comparison.
Record date and scope; retain the previous version and reason when changing it.
- Paper and calendar
- Task app with durations
- Spreadsheet for planned and actual time
alpen-method-working-template.md
Bring together calendar, open commitments and task list; calculate available working time excluding breaks.
ALPEN Method: Worksheet
Question
To be confirmed
Desired outcome
To be confirmed
Scope
Complete cycle Time: 5–10 minutes planning plus a brief review; daily practice
Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.
Preparation for this scope
Method setup
- Materials: Calendar, task list, duration estimates and brief actual-time notes.
- Roles: The person planning; involve affected people for delegation or appointment changes.
- Advance information: Bring together calendar, open commitments and task list; calculate available working time excluding breaks.
- Overall time needed: 5–10 minutes planning plus a brief review; daily practice
- Setup: Open the daily list beside the calendar; separate planned and free time visibly and leave room for actual durations.
Prepare for the work steps
A: Tasks: A: Aufgaben, list tasks
- Calendar
- Tasks and commitments
L: Duration: L: Länge, estimate duration
- Daily list
- Previous actual times
P: Buffer: P: Puffer, reserve buffers
- Available working time
- Effort estimate
E: Decide: E: Entscheidungen, decide
- Planning capacity
- Priorities and deadlines
N: Review: N: Nachkontrolle, review
- Daily plan
- Actual times and interruptions
ALPEN Method· worksheet
A: Tasks
What tasks, appointments and commitments are due today?
...
L: Duration
How long does each task take including preparation?
...
P: Buffer
How much working time is available and how much remains free?
...
E: Decisions
What fits in planned capacity and what is deliberately changed?
...
N: Review
What was completed, how long did it take and what follows for tomorrow?
...
Answer the prompts with your own information. Explicitly mark unknowns and assumptions.
Deutsche Umweltakademie: ALPEN-Methode
A: Tasks: A: Aufgaben, list tasks
Expected artifact: Daily list
Are appointments and carried-over tasks included?
Entry:
...
- Are appointments and carried-over tasks included?
L: Duration: L: Länge, estimate duration
Expected artifact: Estimates
Do estimates match similar completed tasks?
Entry:
...
- Do estimates match similar completed tasks?
P: Buffer: P: Puffer, reserve buffers
Expected artifact: Capacity
Is the buffer actually unallocated?
Entry:
...
- Is the buffer actually unallocated?
E: Decide: E: Entscheidungen, decide
Expected artifact: Daily plan
Does the sum of commitments fit including buffer?
Entry:
...
- Does the sum of commitments fit including buffer?
N: Review: N: Nachkontrolle, review
Expected artifact: Learning note
Did a variance lead to a concrete adjustment?
Entry:
...
- Did a variance lead to a concrete adjustment?
Open questions and next steps
...
Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/alpen-method/run-sheet
Example output
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
Fictional example for orientation. Counts and timings describe this case and are not universal requirements.
alpen-method-beispiel.md
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
Fictional example
A: Tasks: Fictional: write proposal, client call, invoices, filing.
L: Duration: Proposal 120, call 60, invoices 60, filing 90 minutes: 330 minutes.
P: Buffer: 400 minutes excluding breaks; 240 planned and 160 buffer.
E: Decisions: Proposal, call and invoices remain; 90 minutes of filing are deferred.
N: Review: Proposal 140, call 60, invoices 50, interruptions 80 minutes. 330 of 400 minutes used; increase future proposal estimates.
Pitfalls
Recognize symptoms and steer against them
Quick overview, the full text is in the matching phase in the flow
- A: Aufgaben, list tasksInvisible routine work is missing.View in phase
- L: Länge, estimate durationDesired duration replaces actual effort.View in phase
- P: Puffer, reserve buffersExtra tasks occupy the buffer.View in phase
- E: Entscheidungen, decideEverything receives the same top priority.View in phase
- N: Nachkontrolle, reviewOpen tasks are blindly copied each day.View in phase
A: Aufgaben, list tasks
Invisible routine work is missing.
Add calendar commitments and recurring obligations.
L: Länge, estimate duration
Desired duration replaces actual effort.
Use previous actual times or split the task further.
P: Puffer, reserve buffers
Extra tasks occupy the buffer.
Move extra tasks to an optional list.
E: Entscheidungen, decide
Everything receives the same top priority.
Decide by consequences of delay and negotiate conflicts openly.
N: Nachkontrolle, review
Open tasks are blindly copied each day.
Reassess relevance, task size and commitment.
Stop criteria
When to pause, resolve prerequisites, or choose another approach
Finished the method guide?
Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.

