methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Working Backwards with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Working Backwards
Paper illustration of Power-Interest Grid with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Facilitation
Power Interest Grid
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
When the target state and benefit need to be clear first, it thinks backward from the desired outcome into the product logic. It sharpens vision, objections, and value proposition before elaboration.When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
4-8 h, mehrere Iterationen30-60 min1-5 Tage1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
2-62-8Nutzertraffic4-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Future Press Release, FAQ, Vision StatementPower Interest Grid, Strategy per StakeholderInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
VisionNarrativeAlignment
StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods