methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Working Backwards with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Working Backwards
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Purposedifferent
When the target state and benefit need to be clear first, it thinks backward from the desired outcome into the product logic. It sharpens vision, objections, and value proposition before elaboration.When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
4-8 h, mehrere Iterationen45-75 min1-5 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-62-8NutzertrafficNutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Future Press Release, FAQ, Vision StatementTest Matrix, Test PlanClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning DecisionInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning Note
Tagsno overlap
VisionNarrativeAlignment
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
Add more methods