View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Working Backwards | ![]() Decision Making Assumption Surfacing | ![]() Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the target state and benefit need to be clear first, it thinks backward from the desired outcome into the product logic. It sharpens vision, objections, and value proposition before elaboration. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 4-8 h, mehrere Iterationen | 45-90 min | 90-180 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 2-8 | 4-12 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Future Press Release, FAQ, Vision Statement | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report |
Tagsno overlap | VisionNarrativeAlignment | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis |



