View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Working Agreements | ![]() Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes | ![]() Innovation Design Charrette | ![]() Team Design Spotify Model Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | Half day | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 10-50 | 5-15 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction | Spotify Model Map, Action List |
Tagsno overlap | TeamCollaborationAgile | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis |



