methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Working Agreements.
Agile
Working Agreements
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Paper illustration for Planning Poker.
Agile
Planning Poker
Paper illustration of Team Topologies Interaction Modes with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team Topologies Interaction Modes
Purposedifferent
When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions.When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 minHalf day initial, dann laufend2-5 min je ItemHalf day
Participantsdifferent
3-12Ein Team plus Stakeholder3-9Team-Leads plus Architecture
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review CadenceTeam API DocumentRelative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split CandidatesInteraction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair
Tags1 shared
TeamCollaborationAgile
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam
TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization
Add more methods