View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Working Agreements |  Agile Story Points |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Engineering Goal Question Metric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | laufend, 1-5 min je Item | 2-4 h | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-9 | 3-12 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | Point Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity Data | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | GQM Table, Metric Profiles |
Tagsno overlap | TeamCollaborationAgile | EstimationAgileMeasurement | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment |