View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Working Agreements |  Agile Story Points |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Facilitation Team Charter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | laufend, 1-5 min je Item | 45-90 min | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-9 | 3-12 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | Point Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity Data | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes |
Tagsno overlap | TeamCollaborationAgile | EstimationAgileMeasurement | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | TeamAlignmentCollaboration |