View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Working Agreements |  Decision Making PERT Estimation |  Team Design Spotify Model Mapping |  Facilitation Team Charter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes. | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 15-45 min | 90-180 min | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 1-8 | 5-15 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | PERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes | Spotify Model Map, Action List | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes |
Tagsno overlap | TeamCollaborationAgile | EstimationUncertaintyRisk | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | TeamAlignmentCollaboration |