View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Working Agreements |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Facilitation Team Charter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 5-15 min | 1-3 h | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-20 | 5-30 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes |
Tagsno overlap | TeamCollaborationAgile | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | TeamAlignmentCollaboration |