View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Working Agreements |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Facilitation Decision Jam |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-3 h | 2-4 h | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 5-30 | 3-12 | 4-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment |
Tagsno overlap | TeamCollaborationAgile | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop |