methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Wizard of Oz Test
Product Discovery
Wizard of Oz Test
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Paper illustration for Concierge MVP
Product Discovery
Concierge MVP
Purposedifferent
When a new experience would still be too expensive to automate for real, it simulates the outcome behind the scenes. It checks user reaction and value before the technology disappears.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
2-10 Tage1-2 Tage30-60 min je Interview1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
5-20 Nutzer10-305-10 Interviews3-10 Kunden
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Prototype Learnings, Manual Effort Notes, Risk ListClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsSolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesConcierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks
Tags1 shared
PrototypeValidationMVP
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
MVPValidationServiceDiscovery
Add more methods