View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Waste Analysis |  Agile Example Mapping |  Engineering Kanban |  Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a process that keeps people busy but creates little value, the method exposes waste. It directs attention to unnecessary movement, waiting times, rework, and overdelivery. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When work sits in too many parallel streams, throughput suffers and no one sees the bottlenecks. Kanban makes the flow of work visible and limits overload so a system becomes calmer and more predictable. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-120 min | 30-60 min | Ongoing | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-7 | 2-12 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Waste Map, Prioritized Waste, Improvement Backlog | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Kanban board, WIP policies, Flow metrics | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | WasteLeanProcess improvement | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | FlowVisual managementDelivery | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |