methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Waste Analysis.
Operations
Waste Analysis
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Value Stream Mapping workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Delivery
Value Stream Mapping
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Purposedifferent
For a process that keeps people busy but creates little value, the method exposes waste. It directs attention to unnecessary movement, waiting times, rework, and overdelivery.DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.When delivery work dissolves into wait times, handoffs, and hidden effort, Value Stream Mapping makes the actual flow visible. The method exposes bottlenecks, idle time, and feedback loops so lead time and improvement levers become tangible.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
45-120 min1-2 h1-3 h45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-82-84-103-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Waste Map, Prioritized Waste, Improvement BacklogDIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning reportCurrent-state map, Future-state map, Bottleneck listForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
WasteLeanProcess improvement
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
LeanFlowWasteDelivery
ChangeDecisionStrategy
Add more methods