methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of VRIO Framework with its method-specific working model.
Business Strategy
VRIO Framework
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration of Spotify Model Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Spotify Model Mapping
Purposedifferent
The VRIO Framework rates resources and capabilities on whether they are Valuable, Rare, Inimitable, and Organized. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and courses of action. The result is captured as a VRIO table and strategic actions.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
90-180 min45-90 min45-90 min90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
3-63-103-125-15
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
VRIO Table, Strategic ActionsResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsExpectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsSpotify Model Map, Action List
Tagsno overlap
StrategyDiagnosisBusiness modelCapability
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis
Add more methods