methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Views and Beyond method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Views and Beyond
Three Amigos method illustration showing its working structure
Agile
Three Amigos
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration of Acceptance Criteria Workshop with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Agile
Acceptance Criteria Workshop
Purposedifferent
Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question.When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 Tage15-30 min15-45 min20-40 min pro Story
Participantsdifferent
1-431-33-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Architecture Views, Cross-view Notes, RationaleClarified Story, Test Examples, Open QuestionsADR File, Decision Log, RationaleAcceptance Criteria, Story Update
Tagsno overlap
DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture
CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development
Add more methods