methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Views and Beyond method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Views and Beyond
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Purposedifferent
Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 TageHalf day initial, dann laufend15-45 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
1-4Ein Team plus Stakeholder1-33-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Architecture Views, Cross-view Notes, RationaleTeam API DocumentADR File, Decision Log, RationaleExpectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements
Tagsno overlap
DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
Add more methods