View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Views and BeyondDecision Rights MappingArchitecture Decision RecordStakeholder Salience Model
| Criterion |  Architecture Views and Beyond |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Tage | 90-180 min | 15-45 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-4 | 4-12 | 1-3 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Architecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |