View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery Value Stream Mapping |  Agile Three Amigos |  Engineering Kanban |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When delivery work dissolves into wait times, handoffs, and hidden effort, Value Stream Mapping makes the actual flow visible. The method exposes bottlenecks, idle time, and feedback loops so lead time and improvement levers become tangible. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | When work sits in too many parallel streams, throughput suffers and no one sees the bottlenecks. Kanban makes the flow of work visible and limits overload so a system becomes calmer and more predictable. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 15-30 min | Ongoing | 20-40 min pro Story |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 3 | 2-12 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Current-state map, Future-state map, Bottleneck list | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | Kanban board, WIP policies, Flow metrics | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update |
Tagsno overlap | LeanFlowWasteDelivery | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | FlowVisual managementDelivery | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development |