View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy Value Proposition Canvas |  Business Strategy Three Horizons |  Operations ABC Analysis |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the value proposition and customer expectation drift apart, it makes fit and mismatch legible. It shows where offering and need don't yet come together. | Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon. | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | Halbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ | 30-60 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-12 | 1-5 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Value Proposition Canvas, Fit Gaps, Hypotheses | Horizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource plan | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | ValueNeedsStrategy | StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds |