View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Strategy Value Proposition Canvas |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the value proposition and customer expectation drift apart, it makes fit and mismatch legible. It shows where offering and need don't yet come together. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 1-3 h | 15-45 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Value Proposition Canvas, Fit Gaps, Hypotheses | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options |
Tagsno overlap | ValueNeedsStrategy | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning |