View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery User Story Mapping | ![]() UX Research Customer Journey Mapping | ![]() Operations Weekly Review | ![]() Product Discovery Concierge MVP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When user goals and delivery scope could drift apart, it orders the journey from goal to slice. It makes visible where an MVP can genuinely be cut. | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. | In a week with many open loops, the method creates distance from operational noise. It organizes commitments, calendar, and projects so the next week becomes workable. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 2-4 h | 30-60 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 4-10 | 1 | 3-10 Kunden |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Story Map, Release Slices, Backlog Candidates | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog | Updated Task System, Weekly Focus, Next Actions | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks |
Tagsno overlap | BacklogJourneyPlanningMVP | JourneyServiceService design | ProductivityExecutionPlanning | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery |



