methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a horizontal story map with an activity backbone, task cards below it and a cross-map release line.
Product Discovery
User Story Mapping
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
When user goals and delivery scope could drift apart, it orders the journey from goal to slice. It makes visible where an MVP can genuinely be cut.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
2-4 h45-90 min15-30 min10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
4-102-52-61
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Story Map, Release Slices, Backlog CandidatesA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
BacklogJourneyPlanningMVP
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods